[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911121536.nACFaJuo032210@core.courtesan.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:36:19 -0500
From: "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@...rtesan.com>
To: Leandro Malaquias <lm.net.security@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Microsoft Patents the "sudo" command
In message <4AFC1708.7040508@...il.com>
so spake Leandro Malaquias (lm.net.security):
> Website: http://gizmodo.com/5402796/microsoft-patents-the-sudo-command
> Patent:
> http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1
> &u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,617,530.PN.&OS=PN/7,617,530&RS
> =PN/7,617,530
This doesn't sound like it would cover sudo to me, or even a
GUI-wrapper for sudo. While I am not a patent attorney, I have
been hacking on sudo for the past 15+ years.
My reading of the patent indicates that it is geared towards GUI-based
environments where the user may need to perform some action (such
as setting the clock in a control panel) that requires increased
privileges. The actual "invention" appears to be that the user is
able to perform an action as a different user without having to
type in the name of that other user when authenticating. One example
given in that patent is the ability to click on a name in a list
of privileged users as opposed to having to type in a user name.
Sudo simply doesn't work this way.
- todd
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists