[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091126.050840.267259729.maxigas@anargeek.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:08:40 +0000 (GMT)
From: maxigas <maxigas@...rgeek.net>
To: rc46fi@...glemail.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: UK jails schizophrenic for refusal to decrypt
files
From: Gregor Schneider <rc46fi@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] UK jails schizophrenic for refusal to decrypt files
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:41:48 +0100
> Today, a computer often has become a part of the mind - notes, diaries
> and so on. Therefore, this case to me is somehow equivalent to putting
> someone into jail just because he does not want to answer a question -
> which is definatelay a violation of a fundamental human right.
Indeed, I seem to recall that in the decision of the German high court (the country where bureacrats are maybe the most advanced in understanding technology) there was a reasoning to that effect, e.g. arguing that the contents of computers fall under the freedom of thought, since you use them to put down your everyday thoughts. I could be mistaken about the fact though, but the line of thought is really interesting: to recognise in the legal system the fact that in practice we became cyborgs: our neural circuits are interrupted and wired to our notebooks. Not a new thing, that one about using notebooks, of course (that changed happened a long time ago), but still widely unrecognised. 8-/
--
×× maxigas
// villanypásztor / kiberpunk / web shepherd //
"For us it was but a game -- that's why we took it more seriously than others."
-= Important communication disclaimer: by replying to my emails you are disclaiming all your disclaimers. =-
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists