full-disclosure - Re: iAWACS 2010 : Rules of the PWN2KILL contest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18043.1263230965@localhost>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:29:25 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Thierry Zoller <Thierry@...ler.lu>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: iAWACS 2010 : Rules of the PWN2KILL contest

On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:45:33 +0100, Thierry Zoller said:

> Apparently  proactive  detection  rules can simply be ignored based on
> the  assumption  a  grandma will click yes anyways.(below) I am not
> sure  thought a grandma really provides the incentive to create custom
> code in real life ;)

Unfortunately, out in the real world, grannies cause botnets. And botnets
make money. So botnet authors have plenty of incentive to create codes.

Of course, that doesn't mean anybody will feel an incentive to create
custom code for this contest...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/