[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4B5E7A06.18737.B0EF9B48@nick.virus-l.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:13:42 +1300
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk>
To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
I've resisted getting involved in this and suspect that this may be a
misguided attempt to clarify (??) a few things, but...
Bipin Gautam wrote:
> Before: "From the prosecutor's perspective, everything your hard drive is yours"
>
> I just proved : everything your hard drive is NOT NECESSARILY YOURS.
This need not matter. In several (many, most and increasing) Western
jurisdictions _just possessing_ certain kinds of material is a criminal
offense. This is typically child pornography and/or beastiality but
often includes other more or less specific things. For example,
writing as I am from New Zealand right now, I would almost certainly be
committing an indecency offense by including the words "golden" and
"shower" run together into a single phrase in this Email.
Within such jurisdictions, the issue of "knowledgable possession" or
"intent to possess" are technically irrelevant to the issue of "did you
breach this law", for as written, the offence is "possession" (and/or
production, etc, etc) with no elaboration.
> DOES THAT CHANGE ANYTHING? LOGIC MAYBE???
I guess to assess that, we have to first decide whether you know what
you're talking about or not...
And have you not heard of "the Trojan Horse defense"? Kinda the legal
opposite of "the dog ate my homework" and already successfully used a
few times.
Regards,
Nick FitzGerald
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists