[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C784622E.4839%charles.skoglund@bitsec.se>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:11:10 +0100
From: Charles Skoglund <charles.skoglund@...sec.se>
To: Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam@...il.com>, Rohit Patnaik <quanticle@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
This discussion is getting weirder and weirder. If an examiner finds
evidence on YOUR computer / cell phone / usb disks / whatever, please do
tell me how it's not necessarily yours? By claiming your computer has been
hacked? You do know an examiner usually knows how to double-check your story
for malicious code right? Or what are you guys talking about?
My experience is that when I find the evidence, the person/s being
investigated confesses quite rapidly.
Cheers!
On 1/26/10 4:31 AM, "Bipin Gautam" <bipin.gautam@...il.com> wrote:
> So to the point, the techniques of forensic examiners were flawed from
> day one given that any text/evidence found on your computer is NOT
> NECESSARILY yours! Does that break digital forensics........?
> oops.................
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists