[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BDFD0BC.5040708@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 09:46:04 +0200
From: PsychoBilly <zpamh0l3@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: go public to avoid jail
************************ Cluster #[[ J Roger ]] possibly emitted, @Time [[ 03/05/2010 22:09 ]] The Following #String **********************
> There were excerpts in the Wired article, and there are more in the
> court record
>
>
> One has to begin wondering:
>
> A) Why did Gonzales keep logs of incriminating evidence against himself
> and his friends in the first place?
> B) What motivation did Gonzales have for rolling over on Stephen like
> that? Given Stephen's minor involvement in the case, it seems like
> Gonzales wouldn't get much by way of a plea deal by turning him in.
> C) Another Wired article states that Gonzales was an informer paid an
> annual salary by the Secret Service. This revelation apparently was
> brought to light by Stephen himself. Did The_UT know this was the case
> before his arrest or only after? If he knew these circumstances prior to
> his arrest then why would he be willing to create a custom tool for a
> person he knows is informing on people?
Rather simple:
1- G is known to have links with agencies.
2- He's giving info-dumps about scene since a long time after being caught once ( and to avoid 'divine retribution' )
3- the_UT thought those relations would act as a magic voodoo talisman.
4- Gonzales played dirty, to relax charges a little, there's why logs were logged ( yes, associals friendship, my friends, well, just sucks... )
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists