[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinnIGRcFVyK07MkAlPWbgKtADesy8X1sXX-iuga@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:49:26 -0400
From: T Biehn <tbiehn@...il.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Congratulations Andrew
Yes.
The FBI was investigating the AT&T incident, presumably the AT&T incident
was what the fed were serving against.
What possible valid search warrant could be executed? There was no hack,
breach, illegal access of data, or anything else for that matter.
If you leave a system online with no password which allows you to scrape
content you have a legal right to scrape that content.
-Travis
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:10 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:09:22 EDT, T Biehn said:
>
> > I doubt the search warrant will hold up in court.
>
> Do you have any actual basis for saying that? Sure, the warrant might be
> bullshit, it might be solid - the article doesn't give us enough info
> either
> way to tell.
>
> "Auernheimer was also arrested in March for giving a false name to law
> enforcement officers responding to a parking complaint."
>
> Sad. The dude may have the intelligence to pull the hack, but not have the
> wisdom to not dig a hole deeper. Just man up and take the frikking parking
> ticket. ;)
>
>
--
FD1D E574 6CAB 2FAF 2921 F22E B8B7 9D0D 99FF A73C
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=tbiehn&op=index&fingerprint=on
http://pastebin.com/f6fd606da
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists