[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinTO=TzvQHq_ZJViFgq0cxToVsQFVBz3Q_2+m-7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:57:35 -0700
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: the real stuxnet authors plz stand up
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, coderman <coderman@...il.com> wrote:
> stuxnet is strategic, and misleading...
misleading because the failures induced in target present as
inefficiencies and mechanical fatigue in centrifuge process; intent is
to cast suspicion and resources on manufacturing and/or assembly of
centrifuge hardware as cursory checks of digital systems (data
presumably acquired from floor) return normative.
good game, sirs!
target spends dollars and weeks/months pursuing errors in physical
supply and installation paths en-route to / on site, all the while the
wear is digitally done; out of sight, out of mind...
this game (offensive, methodical, precision targeted high-assurance
malware) is an odd sort of global-actor assasination politik. like
china blasting sats in space, it was bound to happen sooner or later
:P
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists