[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinqZ6JwEvaUFtSycN3Y3MHN4Ct3-aaaYQo+_jLR@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:30:06 -0700
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: the real stuxnet authors plz stand up
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:57 PM, coderman <coderman@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, coderman <coderman@...il.com> wrote:
>> stuxnet is strategic, and misleading...
>
> misleading because the failures induced in target present as
> inefficiencies and mechanical fatigue in centrifuge process...
Qom also hit - the fingerprinting mechanism is essentially mapped to
form and function, rather than specific instance. That is to say, the
Qom centrifuge enrichment deployment is sufficiently similar in
devices and software applied (WinCC, 6ES7-417, 6ES7-315-2, etc.) as to
also fall under precision targeting.
yay full disclosure.
0x04
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists