full-disclosure - Re: NiX - Linux Brute Forcer (the beast) has been released!]]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:56:38 -0800
From: Robert Kim App and Facebook Marketing <evdo.hsdpa@...il.com>
To: nix@...roxylists.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: NiX - Linux Brute Forcer (the beast) has been
	released!]]

Are there any exclusively NiX forums? I've run into similar issues and
google isnt finding much for me

ugh

> Some people have asked what advantages NiX offers over other tools, this
> question should have been answered now.
>
>>
>> Good job coding it though, I can't imagine that was easy.
>> Ryan
>
> Thanks, really difficult and time consuming project but i have verified it
> to be stable (45k combolist and over 1000 proxies).
>
> PS. If any of you downloaded yesterday 1.0.0 version, please download
> immediately the latest 1.0.1 version is i forgot to fix something
> important (told in CHANGELOG) before i packed the release version.
>
> If you find a bug, just let me know and i try to fix it asap.
>
>>>>> other tools? Where is SOCKS4 proxy support? Where is proxy
>>>>> randomization?
>>>>> Where is logic to drop dead proxies? Where is logic for
>>>>> fake-detection?
>>>>
>>>> Then, you should have started by that, it is that simple.
>>>> We are all busy and you can't expect anyone to even have a look on
>>>> your
>>>> tool or link if you don't highlight how different it is from others or
>>>> why you did it.
>>>>
>>>> As far as I am concerned, these features may be nice, but I don't need
>>>> them and will stick to Medusa for the brute force tests I run from
>>>> time
>>>> to time (ie not often, a few times a year at most).
>>>> But, to make it clear, it is just my personal opinion, I am not saying
>>>> that your tool is not interesting or useless.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I just gave a test-run for Hydra against my own site and noticed:
>>>
>>> It does support only single proxy, any site that has even a bit
>>> protection
>>> have
>>> working proxies) with randomization etc. This is significant advantage
>>> over any other tool.
>>>
>>> I have worked 1.5 months constantly on NiX, after i have had a little
>>> break. I will implement support for other major protocols which is now
>>> really easy after having otherwise working engine.
>>>
>>>
-- 
Robert Q Kim
Clothing Manufacturer and Garment Production
http://dmresourcela.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeBa9Wz-k0s
2611 S Coast Highway
San Diego, CA 92007
310 598 1606

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/