full-disclosure - Re: An idea of leaking alternative to wikileaks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:24:28 +0100
From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
To: "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <lists@...osecurity.ch>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: An idea of leaking alternative to wikileaks

> It's a matter of splitting up responsibility among various players and
> distributing almost everything.

Leaking information is not a game, unlike some kids seem to think.

> With the growing number of improvised leak sites and more to come in
> future, most doesn't even have a methodology/risk model or fully
> understand the level of risks they are taking.

Just because someone got busted and found a number of lunatics in providing
mirrors doesn't mean there's a whole industry. If anything, there must be
some
industry in making good use of these said lunatics. Perhaps, by teaching
them
the difference between "hacking" and "script-kidding" websites.

> That's just an idea of a possible methodology.

Which people tried already...and failed.

> Which kind of trouble you refer to? It's nice to ear about understanding
> and risks analysis on that stuff.

Libel, fraud, sharing of illegal material.

Hey, if you're really intent on going along with this, be my guest. I'll be
watching
the drama fold from afar. Same kind of stuff that happened with/to
Wikileaks.
A momentary hit/fad/hype and the next it's laughed of until it's
forgotten...

Cheers,
Chris.

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <
lists@...osecurity.ch> wrote:

> It's a matter of splitting up responsibility among various players and
> distributing almost everything.
>
> With the growing number of improvised leak sites and more to come in
> future, most doesn't even have a methodology/risk model or fully
> understand the level of risks they are taking.
>
> That's just an idea of a possible methodology.
>
> Which kind of trouble you refer to? It's nice to ear about understanding
> and risks analysis on that stuff.
>
> -naif
>
> On 15/12/10 12.01, Christian Sciberras wrote:
> > Nice recipe to easily end up in a ton of trouble and ridicule.
> >
> > My 2 cents...
>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/