[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110114155413.GC18513@baltika>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:54:13 +0000
From: Adrien Kunysz <adrien@...ysz.be>
To: Nelson Brito <nbrito@...ure.org>
Cc: 'Aaron' <apconole@...oo.com>, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, dailydave@...ts.immunitysec.com
Subject: Re: [Dailydave] [TOOL RELEASE] T50 Sukhoi PAK FA
Mixed Packet Injector v2.45r-H2HC
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:10:15PM -0200, Nelson Brito wrote:
> And lastly, but not least, how could you pretend to do something to get a high-performance fashion playing with multi-core (multi-thread) if you are still limited by Kernel's network device queue??? Are you insane???
I don't know about the rest of this mail and I might misunderstand this
but Linux has had support for multiqueued NICs for some times now so
as far as I can tell, a multithreaded packets generation tool makes
may make sense if you want high performance on modern hardware (and
it's pretty much required if you want to fully utilize your 10Gb/s link).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists