full-disclosure - Re: Getting Off the Patch (is pointing out obvious)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:51:09 +0000
From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]"
	<cal.leeming@...plicitymedialtd.co.uk>
To: Григорий Братислава <musntlive@...il.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
	Zach C <fxchip@...il.com>,
	"Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
	"lists@...com.org" <lists@...com.org>
Subject: Re: Getting Off the Patch (is pointing out
	obvious)

I have absolutely no idea what you just said lol.

This part was especially amusing:
"Is when we tie up Pawel in lobby with is cable to car battery example is
set".

Please reply in Russian, and I'll get one of my colleagues to translate.

2011/1/17 Григорий Братислава <musntlive@...il.com>

> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
> <cal.leeming@...plicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
> > Okay, so there's like 40 odd rather long responses to this discussion,
> can
> > someone give a one word answer as to whether or not they are worth taking
> > the time to read through?
>
>  Is obvious you is not in this game to learn therefore I ask that you
> leave. All is say by both Thor and is Pete is worth is weight on gold.
> Valdis, is sometimes maybe yes good to read. Thor is shark, is worth
> reading to is learn from everytimes. Please, is no bother this thread
> or list with such stupid answers yes?
>
>  Is musntlive has better solution for no is patching. Unplug is your
> network and then is all you worry about is local threat. With enough
> waterboarding, is one can defend against the local attack vectors, for
> is example:
>
>  Pawel is system administrator for is catch him doing something
> sneaky. Is when we tie up Pawel in lobby with is cable to car battery
> example is set. Other workers is now know: "Data is private as used to
> be his balls. Pawel is like seeing other people's data, is now we see
> his data. Look at Pawel when we is touch is two battery terminals!!
>
>  Maybe must change slogan: -- "InSecurity -- is we not play this is
> game!!" (TM musntlive 2011)
>
> [ WARNING -- FULL DISCLOSURE: -- Pawel was is not harmed during is
> typing of is email I write you. His name is for only scenario purposes
> only. DISCLAIMER: -- NO IS WORKERS, COWORKERS, CONTRACTORS, IS THIRD
> PARTY VENDORS WAS IS HARMED DURING IS TYPING OF IS LETTER. ANY IS
> RELATED INJURIES IS HEREBYTOFORTHOU COINCIDENTAL. MUSNTLIVE IS IS NOT
> RESPONSIBLE FOR IS CLAIMS IS MADE BY ANYONE IS AFTER 17 JAN 2011 00:48
> ]
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/