full-disclosure - Re: SSL Capable NetCat and more

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTiki=rFjshK1ioOXRWAoOUC=kURQozx_Z2fQ2V3S@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:00:01 +1100
From: "-= Glowing Doom =-" <secn3t@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: SSL Capable NetCat and more

err typo on the first line 'cryptcat' is tool i mean... an offcut of
netcat...yes,it supports encrypted /invisible connections... or so i
believe....


On 31 March 2011 14:53, -= Glowing Doom =- <secn3t@...il.com> wrote:

> duhhh ever heard of a tool called 'sryptcat ala cc'... god what a joke of a
> post.,...
> find your tools, dont remake the wheel, and usually, that gets remade
> badkly! use cryptcat if you are going to be whacking... bloody hell!
> grow some brain and stop propping a shitty app wich has been DONE!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> XD / HaqNET !
>
>
>
> On 31 March 2011 14:28, Randal T. Rioux <randy@...cyonlabs.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/27/2011 4:29 PM, Dan Tulovsky wrote:
>> >> Beside that, scnc is written in pure-Perl, and is easily modifiable
>> >> by anyone. Such really simple (dumb?) stuff should not be written in
>> >> low-level languages such as C.
>> >
>> > You can't be serious...
>>
>> Shirley, he is.
>>
>> Perl is shite. It's a dependency hell, it lacks the "logic" of C/C++ and
>> is interpreted (as pointed out by others). Any code base can be
>> modifiable by anyone - as long as it is open sourced.
>>
>> Don't get me wrong, I'm not criticizing the product. I think reinventing
>> the wheel in lesser performing methods is great. Just don't disregard C.
>> To be honest, in my code auditing days, it was SO much easier to find
>> flaws in C/C++ than Perl, because Perl is just messy and ugly. Something
>> looks wrong, but it's right. Uggh!
>>
>> But if you need to write something quick for an easy task, by all means,
>> hit the Perl.
>>
>> It's like using Java to write large scale enterprise products. Who the
>> hell? Why? Portability is nice, but performance is better. Java belongs
>> in the small-scale realm of applications.
>>
>> Grumble grumble. Get off my lawn. Back to the lair :-)
>>
>> Randy
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/