full-disclosure - Re: SSL Capable NetCat and more

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTinUUR_NSDUXHOaitoSkE4tXim=p4m+5JnnM2-QW@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:53:35 +1100
From: "-= Glowing Doom =-" <secn3t@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: SSL Capable NetCat and more

duhhh ever heard of a tool called 'sryptcat ala cc'... god what a joke of a
post.,...
find your tools, dont remake the wheel, and usually, that gets remade
badkly! use cryptcat if you are going to be whacking... bloody hell!
grow some brain and stop propping a shitty app wich has been DONE!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XD / HaqNET !


On 31 March 2011 14:28, Randal T. Rioux <randy@...cyonlabs.com> wrote:

> On 3/27/2011 4:29 PM, Dan Tulovsky wrote:
> >> Beside that, scnc is written in pure-Perl, and is easily modifiable
> >> by anyone. Such really simple (dumb?) stuff should not be written in
> >> low-level languages such as C.
> >
> > You can't be serious...
>
> Shirley, he is.
>
> Perl is shite. It's a dependency hell, it lacks the "logic" of C/C++ and
> is interpreted (as pointed out by others). Any code base can be
> modifiable by anyone - as long as it is open sourced.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I'm not criticizing the product. I think reinventing
> the wheel in lesser performing methods is great. Just don't disregard C.
> To be honest, in my code auditing days, it was SO much easier to find
> flaws in C/C++ than Perl, because Perl is just messy and ugly. Something
> looks wrong, but it's right. Uggh!
>
> But if you need to write something quick for an easy task, by all means,
> hit the Perl.
>
> It's like using Java to write large scale enterprise products. Who the
> hell? Why? Portability is nice, but performance is better. Java belongs
> in the small-scale realm of applications.
>
> Grumble grumble. Get off my lawn. Back to the lair :-)
>
> Randy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/