lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:12:02 +1000
From: "Ivan ." <ivanhec@...il.com>
To: mark seiden <mis@...den.com>
Cc: Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: iPhone Geolocation storage

Interesting write up, and apparently old news....

https://alexlevinson.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/3-major-issues-with-the-latest-iphone-tracking-discovery/

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:59 PM, mark seiden <mis@...den.com> wrote:

> yes, that's right.  on one of the forensics lists someone pointed out that
> he started google maps for 6 seconds
> and ended up with 1253 locations in the cache, all with the same time
> stamp.  those would be potential known
> locations in your neighborhood.
>
> much fuller disclosure in
>
> http://markey.house.gov/docs/applemarkeybarton7-12-10.pdf
>
> including that the some of the location data comes from.... google.
>
> it looks like everything gets anonymized, aggregated to 5 digit zipcodes,
> and max retention of 6 months, but don't
> talk much about what the device does except when it uploads data.
>
> the congressional disclosure, while it makes me feel better about location
> data, contains a few choice items like
>
>
>
> it's unclear how apple can keep app developers from retaining location
> data.  which doesn't seem forbidden by apple, only by law.
>
> it's also unclear why they keep really old data in the cache on the phone.
>  cache bloat results for little benefit.
>
> the android doesn't do time-based pruning either and has a similar location
> cache with the same data it.
>
> it appears to me that since the keying is by mac address or the tower id
> that there will only be one timestamped item for
> each of those.  so if you go around the same neighborhood repeatedly, the
> same data will be in the cache.   so not exactly
> tracking, just recency.
>
> but it would seem prudent to both specify and implement the briefest
> retention of the location data that was possible to perform
> the function expected by the user.
>
> On Apr 20, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Brandon Matthews wrote:
>
> >
> > I've been poring over my phone's data, and I'm not sure if the resolution
> is
> > just very low, or if it's logging the locations of towers and not my
> phone.
> >
> > Ex: http://imgur.com/2m5tO
> >
> > I'm going to xref with FCC databases soon to try and find out.
> >
> > B
> >
> > (Not speaking for Cisco, only for myself and with nobody's approval)
> >
> > On 4/20/11 12:11 PM, "Michele Orru" <antisnatchor@...il.com> did
> declare:
> >
> >> Already twitted today.
> >> Pretty scary btw. I hope there's not the equivalent for Android.
> >>
> >> antisnatchor
> >>
> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Thor (Hammer of God) <mailto:thor@...merofgod.com>
> >>> April 20, 2011 9:05 PM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> For those of you who have not seen this yet:
> >>>
> >>> http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/04/apple-location-tracking.html
> >>>
> >>> Description: Description: Description:
> cid:image001.png@...BA43F.5B83F2A0
> >>>
> >>> /There's no reason to think "outside the box" /
> >>>
> >>> /if you don't think yourself into it. /
> >>>
> >>> **
> >>>
> >>> *My newest book: "Thor's Microsoft Security Bible
> >>> <
> http://www.amazon.com/Thors-Microsoft-Security-Bible-Infrastructures/dp/1597
> >>> 495727C:/Users/thor/Documents/Cakewalk>"
> >>> *
> >>>
> >>> **
> >>>
> >>> *Timothy Thor Mullen
> >>> thor@...merofgod.com <mailto:thor@...merofgod.com>*
> >>>
> >>> *http://www.hammerofgod.com <http://www.hammerofgod.com/>*
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ