[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF84834177.A8618C03-ON8525787E.00433EB0-8525787E.00446642@UNIMIN.COM>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:25:57 -0400
From: SMiller@...min.com
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: iPhone Geolocation storage: Levinson write-up
[Re: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 74, Issue 47]
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:12:02 +1000, "Ivan ." <ivanhec@...il.com> wrote:
"Interesting write up, and apparently old news...."
https://alexlevinson.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/3-major-issues-with-the-latest-iphone-tracking-discovery/
I agree that it was interesting, and raised some pertinent points.
However, the scope of the California Penal Code statute that he cites does
_not_ appear to include PED such as smart phones or pads. It clearly
appears to be directed at tracking devices "permanently" attached to a
vehicle (e.g. LoJack).
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists