[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF0EEE9.10104@propergander.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:03:53 +0100
From: mrx <mrx@...pergander.org.uk>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: NiX API
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/06/2011 16:05, nix@...roxylists.com wrote:
> Primarily this is an advertisement.
>
>
> I would guess that it is some anti-hack system for webmasters who haven't
> a clue, a kind of auto-generating block list.
> I'm a noob and I am just guessing.
>
>
>> It does provide great protection also to those webmasters who got a clue.
>
>> We had fraudulent purchase almost every second day, paypal let every
>> fraudulent purchase through and the ** next day ** their automation
>> reversed the payment. ..
>
>> Needless to say how much we got frustrated and pissed while filing their
>> forms regarding unauthorized claims. We were also charged by paypal for a
>> certain percentage of each fraudulent payment!
>
>> This is where NiX API comes in:
>
>> In most cases, the malicious user is denied access even before a
>> fraudulent purchase is made!
>
>> Since implementation of NiX API with it's current featuers: 0 fraudulent
>> purchases in last 2-3 weeks period. It definitely does something.
>
I don't see how it is possible to tell a fraudulent paypal payment from a legitimate one, unless the IP address used to make the purchase is all
ready known as a source of fraudulent transactions.
Obviously if "John Smith" made a payment from an IP address originating from China, Japan or other non-English/American IP address range then
something is suspect, but this is still not definitive.
How could this system stop a fraudulent payment from a source with an IP address the system has never seen before originating from a corporate
address block or respected ISP, or unlikely but not impossible an IP address that has previously made a valid transaction?
Any smart fraudster would use a device purchased with cash using a spoofed MAC address from a wifi hotspot out of sight of CCTV.
Please enlighten me, or would that let the cat out of the bag?
regards
mx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEVAwUBTfDu6bIvn8UFHWSmAQLG1gf9Gv9cpFERJWbxzY05U4Wd6vYxLQb2N4Oy
eb8HWYsVALjDO2M3Od9FdXRFCtkF7VHx4hsL67fe69UAqRq3+7yUJEpj+vPMGhow
lrb9Nn93R5r14i/dCYJTKQkzQ8zdvkYv3uyvu9A7MP+ME4mukBUTFUyCN2oekr6R
fHa7YcjUkB43+IocUjr0EqnVZLtGMbJsFzGXoUNTVpIwPrj5kvTOo4rK8upwaE9g
1V3TRUM815v2hq7IH9IUdu2mAKB9UDNEp8K6Vi6RL0ZMGNWXsf9BL8kmDD/dcOlf
9e2MSN6QQOYeAMYNaZSgOPOjX0sVqhd/fVKEeBMs+OZaOJOfG1Chow==
=ytkT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists