Message-ID: <BANLkTiko-iodjY=2fZ8fJc4w7hhsmscm+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:52:25 +0200
From: Haxxor Security <h@...r.se>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: POC for a simple gmail/possible code
 injection into html wich can be executed in an email,
 i will make the PoC code and explain how here and now...

As I (painfully tried to) understand it, secn3t can fool his own email
client to create malformed links by pressing backspace...

2011/6/12 adam <adam@...sy.net>

> At the end of the day, you're going to be treated like a child as long as
> you continue to type like one.
>
> The entertaining part for me is how each of your replies contradicts a
> previous one. According to you, this *vulnerability* *has existed for
> years*. And also according to you, the reason why the original email was
> filled with spelling errors is because it *was rushed out due to you being
> "awake" at 6AM.* Do you see the inconsistency between those two
> statements? Your response to Christian also indicated that you* **didn'tjust discover this
> *.
>
> IF this is an old vulnerability and IF you've known about it for an
> extended period of time - WHY did you have to post it right when you did?
> It's old, you've known about it for a while, it's existed for years, yet it
> couldn't wait until later in the day? It couldn't wait until you had time to
> skim over the email and correct any spelling/grammar mistakes? It absolutely
> had to be posted right then and there?
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:14 PM, -= Glowing Doom =- <secn3t@...il.com>wrote:
>
>> Thats why i the people who do understand it, can see that it is there...
>> yes, VERY hard to expalin, id LOVE to see you try.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12 June 2011 12:11, adam <adam@...sy.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Furthermore, pretending that we [the readers] are somehow at fault here
>>> (for not understanding) isn't going to get you very far. The only thing
>>> consistent in this entire thread is that people *kind of* want to know
>>> what you're talking about, but aren't able to due to the poor writing style
>>> and spelling/grammar errors.
>>>
>>> It should be noted that no one is being anal about typos, I fully
>>> understand that people make mistakes. The difference is that it appears you
>>> didn't even so much as proof read the original email.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:04 PM, phocean <0x90@...cean.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi n3td3v... oops!... secn3t (that is close),
>>>>
>>>> Sorry but I don't understand anything to this thread.
>>>> Each of your emails is such a pain to read, that I stop at the first
>>>> sentence.
>>>> We are all busy and don't want to take 20 min to decipher your writing
>>>> with the risk that it is not deserving it.
>>>> Please clarify and give consistent technical facts.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Le 12/06/2011 03:33, -= Glowing Doom =- a écrit :
>>>> > This is NOT coded..  the PoC i am explaining, is possible with simply
>>>> > copyying text,then using a sequence of keys, to make the actual
>>>> > sentence/s, appear.
>>>> > This code is not what shows up when it is dissected.
>>>> > It shows up with many x41 all over the email when it is done properly
>>>> .
>>>> > Regards.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 12 June 2011 11:29, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com
>>>> > <mailto:uuf6429@...il.com>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >     For those lazy enough to search:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/The_CSRSS_Backspace_Bug_still_works_in_windows_2003_sp1
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >     Excerpt:
>>>> >
>>>> >     Basicaly just compile this and you will get a 100% processor usage
>>>> >     by the compiled exploit and Csrss.exe
>>>> >
>>>> >     #include <stdio.h>
>>>> >     int main(void)
>>>> >     {
>>>> >     while(1)
>>>> >     printf("\t\t\b\b\b\b\b\b");
>>>> >     return 0;
>>>> >     }
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >     How this helps in sending spam is beyond me.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >     On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Jeffrey Walton <
>>>> noloader@...il.com
>>>> >     <mailto:noloader@...il.com>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >         On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:06 PM, -= Glowing Doom =-
>>>> >         <secn3t@...il.com <mailto:secn3t@...il.com>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >         > It is now, over 1yr old atleast and exists in riched20.dll.
>>>> >         > This PoC info is over for me also.
>>>> >         Microsoft had problems with a backspace in the past. Search
>>>> for
>>>> >         "CSRSS
>>>> >         Backspace Bug".
>>>> >
>>>> >         > [SNIP
>>>> >
>>>> >         Jeff
>>>> >
>>>> >         _______________________________________________
>>>> >         Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> >         Charter:
>>>> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> >         Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> phocean
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists