full-disclosure - Re: POC for a simple gmail/possible code injection into html wich can be executed in an email, i will make the PoC code and explain how here and now...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:06:04 +1000
From: "-= Glowing Doom =-" <secn3t@...il.com>
To: Haxxor Security <h@...r.se>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: POC for a simple gmail/possible code
 injection into html wich can be executed in an email,
 i will make the PoC code and explain how here and now...

Do the research... then call yourself a 'team'...please :s

The PoC, is easy as hell to reproduce. I am shocked a team, cannot do it..

even the easy one wich is just copy/backspace, and, hit link and enter a
link!
simple ?


On 12 June 2011 12:52, Haxxor Security <h@...r.se> wrote:

> As I (painfully tried to) understand it, secn3t can fool his own email
> client to create malformed links by pressing backspace...
>
>
> 2011/6/12 adam <adam@...sy.net>
>
>> At the end of the day, you're going to be treated like a child as long as
>> you continue to type like one.
>>
>> The entertaining part for me is how each of your replies contradicts a
>> previous one. According to you, this *vulnerability* *has existed for
>> years*. And also according to you, the reason why the original email was
>> filled with spelling errors is because it *was rushed out due to you
>> being "awake" at 6AM.* Do you see the inconsistency between those two
>> statements? Your response to Christian also indicated that you* **didn'tjust discover this
>> *.
>>
>> IF this is an old vulnerability and IF you've known about it for an
>> extended period of time - WHY did you have to post it right when you did?
>> It's old, you've known about it for a while, it's existed for years, yet it
>> couldn't wait until later in the day? It couldn't wait until you had time to
>> skim over the email and correct any spelling/grammar mistakes? It absolutely
>> had to be posted right then and there?
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:14 PM, -= Glowing Doom =- <secn3t@...il.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Thats why i the people who do understand it, can see that it is there...
>>> yes, VERY hard to expalin, id LOVE to see you try.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12 June 2011 12:11, adam <adam@...sy.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Furthermore, pretending that we [the readers] are somehow at fault here
>>>> (for not understanding) isn't going to get you very far. The only thing
>>>> consistent in this entire thread is that people *kind of* want to know
>>>> what you're talking about, but aren't able to due to the poor writing style
>>>> and spelling/grammar errors.
>>>>
>>>> It should be noted that no one is being anal about typos, I fully
>>>> understand that people make mistakes. The difference is that it appears you
>>>> didn't even so much as proof read the original email.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:04 PM, phocean <0x90@...cean.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi n3td3v... oops!... secn3t (that is close),
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry but I don't understand anything to this thread.
>>>>> Each of your emails is such a pain to read, that I stop at the first
>>>>> sentence.
>>>>> We are all busy and don't want to take 20 min to decipher your writing
>>>>> with the risk that it is not deserving it.
>>>>> Please clarify and give consistent technical facts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 12/06/2011 03:33, -= Glowing Doom =- a écrit :
>>>>> > This is NOT coded..  the PoC i am explaining, is possible with simply
>>>>> > copyying text,then using a sequence of keys, to make the actual
>>>>> > sentence/s, appear.
>>>>> > This code is not what shows up when it is dissected.
>>>>> > It shows up with many x41 all over the email when it is done properly
>>>>> .
>>>>> > Regards.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 12 June 2011 11:29, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com
>>>>> > <mailto:uuf6429@...il.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     For those lazy enough to search:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/The_CSRSS_Backspace_Bug_still_works_in_windows_2003_sp1
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     Excerpt:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     Basicaly just compile this and you will get a 100% processor
>>>>> usage
>>>>> >     by the compiled exploit and Csrss.exe
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     #include <stdio.h>
>>>>> >     int main(void)
>>>>> >     {
>>>>> >     while(1)
>>>>> >     printf("\t\t\b\b\b\b\b\b");
>>>>> >     return 0;
>>>>> >     }
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     How this helps in sending spam is beyond me.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Jeffrey Walton <
>>>>> noloader@...il.com
>>>>> >     <mailto:noloader@...il.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >         On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:06 PM, -= Glowing Doom =-
>>>>> >         <secn3t@...il.com <mailto:secn3t@...il.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >         > It is now, over 1yr old atleast and exists in riched20.dll.
>>>>> >         > This PoC info is over for me also.
>>>>> >         Microsoft had problems with a backspace in the past. Search
>>>>> for
>>>>> >         "CSRSS
>>>>> >         Backspace Bug".
>>>>> >
>>>>> >         > [SNIP
>>>>> >
>>>>> >         Jeff
>>>>> >
>>>>> >         _______________________________________________
>>>>> >         Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>>> >         Charter:
>>>>> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>>> >         Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> phocean
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/