full-disclosure - Re: Is this for real.. http://n3td3v.org.uk/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCvwp62MnfR4jDx2H2qG-q8moPykQuh=KSHJM0qU_DNq6wfEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:38:39 +1100
From: GloW - XD <doomxd@...il.com>
To: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Is this for real.. http://n3td3v.org.uk/

Interesting.... please elaborate Andrew. i ant to see your views on this,
and no, no puns, no hatred, purely, why is FD in *crap* if, they are using
that tag of Hosted by Secunia... YOUR own reasons and, what you would define
as leaving

Your idea leaves grok.org.uk in a bad position "Hosted and sponsored by
Secunia"

Basically, saying that groks would be able to be simply removed, as such..
am i right ?
So, i am seeing more crappage, or, just explain... please.
xd

On 4 October 2011 02:46, andrew.wallace <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Jacqui Caren-home <
> jacqui.caren@...world.com> wrote:
> > The site is obviously commercial, hence getting the below revoked
> > should be a doddle via a complaint to enom.
> >
> > Registrant:
> >         Andrew Wallace
> >
> >     Registrant type:
> >         UK Individual
> >
> >     Registrant's address:
> >         The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have
> their
> >         address omitted from the WHOIS service.
> >
> > The above only applies if you are not advertising, selling or trading in
> any manner.
> >
> >
> > UK and EU law regarding commercial web sites is quite well defined but
> very rarely enforced
> > by uk plod etc. Its pretty easy to quote AUP, UK and EU Laws against this
> sort of site to
> > a UK WSP (IIRC google Uk are the WSP).
> >
> > I suspect the site will break the Google AUP somehow - given the lack of
> business
> > contact details and the use of hidden address details I suspect google
> would
> > remove the site then ask questions, hence the need to do execute
> enom/nominet complaint first :-)
> >
> >
> > Jacqui
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
>
>  Your idea leaves grok.org.uk in a bad position "Hosted and sponsored by
> Secunia"
>
>  n3td3v - Security Solutions is not a registered company.
>
> Andrew
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/