Message-ID: <CAJtJjZvgbiabmdywQ0Fj3f3kCSb_w5=ecpvjThCSKLCqkOZpPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:17:16 +0100
From: Darren Martyn <d.martyn.fulldisclosure@...il.com>
To: secn3t@...il.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: VPN providers and any providers in general...

Thanks for the input, I will be putting this as a debate soon for thew Law
Society in the Uni I attend, to see what the legal guys think.

The issue in the example is not fraud, but damage done to the servers (lets
assume root/deface) and perhaps leaking of stolen data - the case I am using
as an example would be, for example, the "LulzSec" breaches. How hard would
they get f*cked on an international scale if arrested? How many countries
will try extradite them?

In my opinion, they should be simply charged, tried and convicted in their
country of residence and be done with it - there is no benefit to society as
a whole to be gained from hanging them three or four times a piece, as I
reckon given a good shock and such, they come out with a newfound respect
for authority and may even be of some benefit to the security community and
the community as a whole. Locking them up merely turns them further toward
criminal lives - and remember, all hackers *have* potential to do good as
well as evil, it is just a matter of their choice. Given a *shove* toward
the right decision is more beneficial in the end.

"Discuss"...

(No, seriously, I wonder what your opinions are on rehabilitative rather
than punitative measures to be taken against criminal hackers, assuming
fraud was *not* involved, and what benefit they can be to the community and
whether it outweighs the negative effects of not making examples of them).

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:34 AM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> wrote:

> Could just lok at the recent david cecil case here in .au.
> It does say alot, because he did breach some bigger networks.. and he was
> committing 'smaller' scale fraud but, still fraud, however, his main problem
> was what he did to a governemnt site, wich was deface it for personal gain,
> not profit.
> It is the latest case wich would be valid of this.
> still.. intresting infos... good stuff.
> xd
>
>
> On 3 October 2011 19:16, Darren Martyn <d.martyn.fulldisclosure@...il.com>wrote:
>
>> Going back to my own example, say all three are first world countries, and
>> A and C are in the EU whilst B is the US. All nations involved have good
>> diplomatic relations and preexisting extradition treaties, and to add
>> interest to it, lets say the LEO in B and C helped the investigation. The
>> criomes would be non-financial, but say, large scale hacks and such. I will
>> use Jake Davis's case as a "canary case" for this though...
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 12:31 AM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, the legend of the mailing-list himself, has spoken.
>>> not knowing you, for all i have seen, your a pathetic sack of rubbish,
>>> and really, what we are discussing, if you had ANY clue, wich obv dont, is
>>> simply how far our own freedom is going.
>>> You are an idiot.
>>> Have a nice day.
>>> xd
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2 October 2011 08:45, andrew.wallace <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 5:50 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
>>>> > On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:16:11 +1000, xD 0x41 said:
>>>> >
>>>> >> As you also said, murder is a no brainer in any place...well, maybe
>>>> not iraq
>>>> >> or afghanistan just yet :P lol..
>>>> >
>>>> > Iraq, for all its problems, is still a place with a somewhat
>>>> functional
>>>> > judicial system. The court system may be broken, but you in general
>>>> *will* at
>>>> > least appear in a courtroom with a judge and be pronounced guilty
>>>> before you're
>>>> > punished.
>>>> >
>>>> > I was actually thinking more along the lines of  totally failed states
>>>> such as
>>>> > Somalia, Sudan, or the contested parts of Afghanistan, where you can't
>>>> be tried
>>>> > for murder because there isn't a court to try you *in*.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Have you not grown old of talking to children on mailing lists?
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Andrew Wallace
>>>>
>>>> Independent consultant
>>>>
>>>> www.n3td3v.org.uk
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists