[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJtJjZtobLV5O5bDSGSbE5cBhkxE8ZXWb_L4yCVP9CLZfGa_Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:24:37 +0100
From: Darren Martyn <d.martyn.fulldisclosure@...il.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, Laurelai <Laurelai@...echan.org>
Subject: Re: VPN providers and any providers in general...
Attrition stopped making their lists of defaced sites years ago, and it was
pretty damn accurate - it was *kind* of like a Zone-H of sorts. (I quite
like Attrition).
Sony incident is interesting, how badly they handled it. They should have
just fessed up right away, and apologised, bringing network back online ASAP
rather than piss off people as much. However, it did not affect them too bad
in the end.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:17 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:25:20 +0900, Robert Kim App and Facebook Marketing
> said:
> > Guys... i can't stand sites like Attrition
> > it's all based on total heresay and feed off mob stupidity. AND it ruins
> > perfectly good reputations.
>
> OK, I'll bite. What percent of Attrition listings are of sites that didn;t
> actually
> get hacked? (Serious question there - I've never actually done a check of
> their
> accuracy. Anybody got numbers to back up Robert's claim?)
>
> And I'm not sure that an Attrition listing is sufficient to ruin a good
> reputation.
> Heck, Sony won a Pwnie Award and it didn't do squat to their stock price.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists