Message-ID: <CANYkwVL2RO4d8F89fJGTrKkrT+pstpLd+Py4t=QXu0Opmu765g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:04:24 -0300
From: Juan Sacco <juansacco@...il.com>
To: secn3t@...il.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: New open source Security Framework

As you might know, or not know, Exploit Pack is working without any
foundation, company, governement and money-giving guy.
There is no professionnal coder, programmer that is paid to develop this
program.

I have tried to ensure that the name of the exploit author is seen in all
the software.It was my bad pasting the license there, but hey! Im human give
me a break you troll.

The next time would be better if you post it in the right place, GitHub.

And in fact youre trying to blame here.

Exploit Pack is licensed GPL let me copy & paste the 4 freedoms. I hope to
do it well this time.

The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your
computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a
precondition for this.
The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom
2).
The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others
(freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to
benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for
this.

Let me ask you why you are spending so much time annoying this GPL software?

I hope next time get a patch of code from you and no nonsense again.

Like I said to lroot. The same goes for YOU. If you want the right to demand
certain things from the program, then go BUY a program and do not harass
people who are writing software for free, or go and help the developers by
writing the functionality yourself.

Juan Sacco

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:36 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> wrote:

> wow i was not going to comment on that pack and have not yet looked but,
> thats plain nasty... to remove a simple credit line, i mean it is not full
> of greetz etc :s and replace... totally pathetic.
>
>
>
> On 5 October 2011 20:32, root <root_@...ertel.com.ar> wrote:
>
>> - * @author Stefan Zeiger (szeiger@...ocode.com)
>> - print "   Written by Blake  "
>> - <Information Author="Blake" Date="August 23 2011" Vulnerability="N/A">
>>
>> +#Exploit Pack - Security Framework for Exploit Developers
>> +#Copyright 2011 Juan Sacco http://exploitpack.com
>> +#
>> +#This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> it under the terms of the
>> +#GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
>> Foundation, either version 3
>> +#or any later version.
>> +#
>> +#This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
>> WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY;
>> +#without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
>> PARTICULAR
>> +#PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details.
>> +#
>> +#You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> along with this program.
>> +#If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/
>>
>>
>>
>> Yeeeeeeees why not?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists