lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <C692F4CAEEEFCC47919467090B372DDA0979229B@hqdag02c.corp.drugstore.com> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:09:28 +0000 From: Michael Schmidt <mschmidt@...gstore.com> To: 'Benjamin Krueger' <benjamin@...ttlefenix.net>, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@...rr.com> Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>, "Zach C." <fxchip@...il.com> Subject: Re: [OT] Obama said: "American people understand that not everybody's been following the rules" And I thought this wasn't a place for politics, I am certain there are forums for that - or your Twitter or Facebook page or whatever, just not here. -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Benjamin Krueger Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:46 PM To: Paul Schmehl Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; Zach C. Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [OT] Obama said: "American people understand that not everybody's been following the rules" I thought the trolls made FD noisy and difficult to read. Boy was I wrong. On Oct 12, 2011, at 2:17 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On October 12, 2011 11:00:32 AM -0700 "Zach C." <fxchip@...il.com> wrote: > >> >> Indeed? Are they supposed to be taking pictures of events with >> handmade cameras? Wearing clothes they made from the ground up? Not >> shaving or shaving with crudely-fashioned makeshift blades from spare metal? >> >> The usage of corporate products does not disqualify one from >> criticizing those corporations, their behaviors, their products or the government. > > No, but it certainly does make one a hypocrite. > >> At >> least partially because it's practically unavoidable for most people. >> Are you honestly saying they should have just spread local word of >> mouth in their area and hoped it would sweep the country because that >> wouldn't have used any corporate resources? That is a most >> inefficient way of moving people, especially with a news media that >> is proving actively hostile to those who are admittedly threatening its cushy seat. > > Isn't that interesting? They want to get rid of all the corps, yet > they don't want to do without their products because it would be "a > most inefficient way of moving people" > > If you can't see the irony and hypocrisy of that position, you might > be a liberal. Oh, 'scuse me, progressive. > > -- > Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst > As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those > of my employer. > ******************************************* > "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of > reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson > "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person > could believe in them." George Orwell > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists