Message-ID: <CALCvwp6e2G3-HQ_Z7QzSEjmScp3yOQ6jF65z38ECdFKbARwQJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:22:34 +1100
From: xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com>
To: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Possible German Governmental Backdoor found
	("R2D2")

Here , i would have doneso initially, but was not sure if / whatt you have
done to maybe pissoff the bosses of the list :P
So im doing this blindly, with faith in just the right to speech, and
nothing more in mind.
I hope i dont get 500 links of threads about you, or your posts, and i hope
i dont see 500 posts, wich are all shitty :P
this is, merely my opinion on freedom to speak, and sofarm, seen no malice,
although i see many others, do see malice to yowards you, wich is, unusual
for *no reason*, so, this is asking the list "what did n3td3v do, exactly*
that got him banned :s
I wont diagree with it, but id like to know why... lol.
cheers.
xd


On 14 October 2011 12:13, andrew.wallace <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>wrote:

> Why not post your opinion to the mailing list? It may make a difference.
>
> Andrew
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com>
> *To:* andrew.wallace <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2011 2:08 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Full-disclosure] Possible German Governmental Backdoor
> found ("R2D2")
>
> I find that stinks.. nomatter who or what dislikes you... unless you
> clearly did harm or attack people in ways that, could not be combatted but,
> by stopping you from *bragging* it, then id see maybe reason for it... but
> on an apprently FD list i would not expect this type of behavious and from
> the little of you that i do know, i still see no malicious intent.. in any
> communications and some of it, was me totally trashing you... but, i still
> saw you doing me no harm, nor to my websites, etc etc.. so, i see no reason
> why your banned, i think it sucks, and im sure many people who believe in
> civil liberties and simply having a right to speech, but then, if you have
> pissed someone who is in charge off, and, your in UK, the moderators maybe
> not in uk, i dont know but, somehow you got yaself banned and, i find it
> weird that, coz, many people are speaking to you and posting for you.. so, i
> find it is abit strange, id just like to see a *why* i guess. This would
> apply to anyone on this list, and, even adam the papsy :sp and cristian the
> geek ;p lol... joking joking :Pm no, i mean it, cristian you look like a
> frigging geek. unfortunaetyly, but, you speak some ok things, when it is not
> coming thru the anus :)
> anyhow, cheers.
> xd
>
>
> On 14 October 2011 11:51, andrew.wallace <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:38 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> > To clarify:  the list itself is (to the best of my knowledge), in fact
> *not*
> > moderated, which involves somebody actually looking at all postings and
> doing a yes/
> > no check on the enclosed content.
> >
> > That is *different* from *certain user addresses* being set to permanent
> > moderation status.
> >
> > There's unfortunately some people that are still fuzzy on the difference,
> and
> > some that insist on conflating the two.
> >
> > https://www.gnu.org/s/mailman/mailman-admin/node22.html
> >
> > tl;dr: No, the list isn't moderated, Andrew is (and other individuals may
> or
> > may not be at any given time).
>
> I'm not moderated, I was completely brick walled. I rely on the industry to
> post my stuff on my behalf.
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists