full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:26:50 +1100
From: xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com>
To: baqstabz <baqstabz@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP
 Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

oh, you really areee lame... go ahead... ddos away... but, you will
never face me, as always :)
typical doskiddy... jealousy bites eh :)
go home, your boring me.
again, this is great stuff from Fd!
DDos, and, all for trying, to mention a few things, and try to be
civil about it. meh. fuck you all.
lame.
if this is your idea, of how to beat on someone, for somethin that,
will soon be public, then go ahead... as i said, no ddos , and no
dsokid,ever dares face me, and, if the list is causing me this much
problems, then it can goto my spam nowon.
fucking gits.

and kiddo, come on out and show yaself..whats matter, scared that ill
fire back ?



On 12 November 2011 13:42, baqstabz <baqstabz@...il.com> wrote:
> Judging by your posts I would go out on the edge and say that you have about
> as much chance of having 0-day (yes, that is including xxs) as your mommy.
> face it lol
>
> Now please, stfu son, you're sounding like a total tardlump; otherwise we
> will have to unleash the dragons and let you see what a 10k botnet feels
> like.
>
>
> On 11/11/2011 23:26, xD 0x41 wrote:
>>
>> Indeeed.
>> Seeing how the wolves are, i ceertainly would bnot release it.
>> i am only saying, I am using cpp, and windows, and, the exploit
>> bypasses all protections, but, since you guys dont have the actual
>> real poc for it, i guess, i would not be saying anything more, and,
>> ill be leaving it, for the proper poc author, to make that choice,
>> wich, personally, i would never handout to a bunch of disrepectful
>> people, as i see, when this is, nothing, i habve held onto, atleast 2
>> GOOd MS 0days for years, you rally think, i will handout the right way
>> todo this ?
>> pfft..   yer right, lets go hand everyone the ms bug :PP ofc, why
>> would i ever not want a 10 k botnet up in a day...  hell yea!
>> i would neverm, give more about this, on this topic, because, i have
>> seen how people are now on this list and, saddens me that half of you
>> do not have a brain. unfortunately..and, saince i dont wish to break
>> any deals made with ms etc, then, i cannot say anything, i dont know,
>> why this is hard to understand..and, i will NOT handout a working
>> scanner, regardless...
>> and, believe it, it does NOT take 49days atall to exploit... theres
>> alot, you dont know..yet.
>>
>> dont ask me further, please.
>> i should never have even said anything, again, i wont make that
>> mistake again, the proof, will as always be n the pudding...
>> later.
>>
>>
>> On 12 November 2011 10:17, Michal Zalewski<lcamtuf@...edump.cx>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> next time, i wont say shit, and, believe it.
>>>
>>> Well it's just that the attack you are describing will be thwarted by
>>> setting a sticky bit on /tmp, and you have not demonstrated otherwise.
>>>
>>> /mz
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/