full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAH8yC8=41UMGgcdn5wBMFkNEE0JDT47QWq86rxrEV8BQOts_xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 01:08:48 -0500
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com>
To: Antony widmal <antony.widmal@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP
 Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Antony widmal <antony.widmal@...il.com> wrote:
> Dear Dan,
> Impacket was at first a Pysmb copy/update from Core Security in order to
> play with RPC. (look at the source)
> They've done some work on pysmb library in order to implement DCE/RPC
> functionality in this dinosaurus lib.
You can also try Dave Aitel's SPIKE.

> This vulnerability is about sending a *huge fucking* stream of UDP packets
> on a closed port in order to trigger a int overflow via a ref count.
> Most of the people here didn't even understand what we are talking
> about/dealing with.
Is this related to the undisclosed MS09-048, which we were told did
not require remediation because the Windows firewall (et al) mitigated
the vulnerability?
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS09-048.mspx.

Jeff

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/