| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALCvwp5xuUwDciuCPbTrBd23aJtfM15K2F9nUyFXToV8=V19dw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:13:20 +1100 From: xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> To: baqstabz <baqstabz@...il.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) 0day for ms, is not so hard, and, i hjave already explained one of them to some people :) but, i dont care, because, you dont have it, and, i do. so, many people have 0days...whats wrong with this ? i found my own, and, thats why i am happy to keep them. and, as i said, one, i have discussed and, made a working scanner binary for.. so, i guess that much, some people do know is true... so, thats not rare atall.. you want to wonder about just wibndows, imagine linux... and, there is , the imagination, is big there and there is plenty and plenty of attacks still available on fully patched NON grsec kernels :) and yes, i have 0days of those, also. enjoy.some get lucky, others just...suck.. On 12 November 2011 13:42, baqstabz <baqstabz@...il.com> wrote: > Judging by your posts I would go out on the edge and say that you have about > as much chance of having 0-day (yes, that is including xxs) as your mommy. > face it lol > > Now please, stfu son, you're sounding like a total tardlump; otherwise we > will have to unleash the dragons and let you see what a 10k botnet feels > like. > > > On 11/11/2011 23:26, xD 0x41 wrote: >> >> Indeeed. >> Seeing how the wolves are, i ceertainly would bnot release it. >> i am only saying, I am using cpp, and windows, and, the exploit >> bypasses all protections, but, since you guys dont have the actual >> real poc for it, i guess, i would not be saying anything more, and, >> ill be leaving it, for the proper poc author, to make that choice, >> wich, personally, i would never handout to a bunch of disrepectful >> people, as i see, when this is, nothing, i habve held onto, atleast 2 >> GOOd MS 0days for years, you rally think, i will handout the right way >> todo this ? >> pfft.. yer right, lets go hand everyone the ms bug :PP ofc, why >> would i ever not want a 10 k botnet up in a day... hell yea! >> i would neverm, give more about this, on this topic, because, i have >> seen how people are now on this list and, saddens me that half of you >> do not have a brain. unfortunately..and, saince i dont wish to break >> any deals made with ms etc, then, i cannot say anything, i dont know, >> why this is hard to understand..and, i will NOT handout a working >> scanner, regardless... >> and, believe it, it does NOT take 49days atall to exploit... theres >> alot, you dont know..yet. >> >> dont ask me further, please. >> i should never have even said anything, again, i wont make that >> mistake again, the proof, will as always be n the pudding... >> later. >> >> >> On 12 November 2011 10:17, Michal Zalewski<lcamtuf@...edump.cx> wrote: >>>> >>>> next time, i wont say shit, and, believe it. >>> >>> Well it's just that the attack you are describing will be thwarted by >>> setting a sticky bit on /tmp, and you have not demonstrated otherwise. >>> >>> /mz >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists