full-disclosure - Re: Google open redirect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKay5BXuHoPct6i9VEF2o2SScH38WJeBAp_sL-PVkfasGXdAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 14:55:50 -0800
From: secure poon <suckure@...il.com>
To: suckure@...il.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Google open redirect

Amount in labor it took to find open redirect: $1.00

Amount Google is willing to pay for undisclosed vulnerability: $500.00

The chance that most of Full-Disclosure saw Tubgirl: Priceless

For everything else, there's the lulz


On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:50 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:

> On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:37:57 -0300, Pablo Ximenes said:
> > I was assuming web vulns found in Google's Infrastructure, and not
> > vulnerabilities in general as I imagine Google wouldn't condone selling
> > vulns on their systems to the highest bidder.
>
> There's what you don't condone, and then there's what you can't do
> a thing about.  There's no way for Google to take any action against
> an under-the-table sale of an exploit...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/