full-disclosure - Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you less than expected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALx_OUAAJLwW76JSo1c-rFaApV9tiHU_w4jMmmFVatWomo75Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 18:05:12 -0800
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
To: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
	bugtraq <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you
 less than expected

> Interesting stuff indeed. However, I don't see you talk about a solution.
> Why is that?

Because it's bugtraq / full-disclosure, where people generally talk
about vulnerabilities...

I'm not sure I follow your drift about Firefox, I don't believe it's
mentioned anywhere.

> Anyhow, correct me if I'm wrong, but this concept won't work when the
> attacked site requires multiple user interaction, right? As in, the user
> will notice something amiss the second time.

Why?

/mz

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/