lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:41:05 +0100
From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
To: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
	bugtraq <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you
 less than expected

> Because it's bugtraq / full-disclosure, where people generally talk
> about vulnerabilities...

Sure thing. Complaining about patches that don't do
anything<http://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2011/12/x-frame-options-or-solving-wrong.html>is
a plus to your reputation, I guess, right? Finding tangible solutions
to your problems means that eventually you'll loose the job.

> I'm not sure I follow your drift about Firefox, I don't believe it's
> mentioned anywhere.

Indeed, you didn't mention Firefox. Someone else did.

> Why?

It's harder to predict how much it would take for a page to load,
as well as your caching concept will fail when the target in question
can only be invoked by the user. Also, there's the situation where
a simple click won't get you anywhere, for instance, in cases where
a user has to enter his credentials as well as to confirm the action.

Chris.

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists