full-disclosure - Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you less than expected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALx_OUB2dSpgf5wvyMynLjdOSgNT-AZcKKiU2m5WVERptj2czA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:35:57 -0800
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
To: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
	bugtraq <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: silly PoCs continue: X-Frame-Options give you
 less than expected

> Sure thing. Complaining about patches that don't do anything is
> a plus to your reputation, I guess, right? Finding tangible solutions
> to your problems means that eventually you'll loose the job.

Cool story, bro.

>> Why?
> It's harder to predict how much it would take for a page to load,
> as well as your caching concept will fail when the target in question
> can only be invoked by the user. Also, there's the situation where
> a simple click won't get you anywhere, for instance, in cases where
> a user has to enter his credentials as well as to confirm the action.

You seem to be serious in this part of your mail, but I still don't follow.

/mz

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/