lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:22:28 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Stefan Weimar <full-disclosure@...is.toppoint.de>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Student expelled from Montreal college after
	finding vulnerability that compromised security of 250, 000

On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:59:53 +0100, Stefan Weimar said:

> > 1) The kid, as part of his major, signed an ethics document.

> A better solution would have been to not do the steps 1 and 2 but make
> an NDA ("Ok, we know and you know but that's enough by now.") instead.
> I mean, some kind of responsible disclosure.
>
> By proposing this "ethics document" it was the college being
> unprofessional and not the kid.

I think you misunderstand - the ethics document was signed *when he
applied as a student".  If you think that's "unprofessional", you
might want to consider that doctors, lawyers, and other professions
have ethics standards as well.  As does anybody who has a CISSP:

https://www.isc2.org/ethics/default.aspx

I'd say anybody who persisted in doing something after they promised
not to would be running afoul of the "necessary public trust and confidence"
clause of the CISSP code of ethics?


Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists