lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 14:22:04 +0100
From: James Condron <>
To: Julius Kivimäki <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: XSS Vulnerability

Ah, but then don't forget that in a contract (which this most certainly is not- but the parallels are there) ambiguity benefits the party which didn't draft the document.

If its reasonable to infer a payment, and reasonable to fail to infer an age range, I think its reasonable to get paid for it.

I guess the email from ebay sorta makes it all moot anyway.

On 29 May 2013, at 13:33, Julius Kivimäki <> wrote:

> Well, they don't exactly state that they're going to pay you either.
> 2013/5/29 Źmicier Januszkiewicz <>
>> Hmm, interesting.
>> For some reason I fail to find the mentioned "age requirements" at the
>> official bug bounty page located at
>> Am I looking in the wrong direction? Can someone please point to where
>> this is written?
>> With kind regards,
>> Z.
>> 2013/5/29 Robert Kugler <>
>>> 2013/5/29 Jeffrey Walton <>
>>>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Robert Kugler
>>>> <> wrote:
>>>>> Hello all!
>>>>> I'm Robert Kugler a 17 years old German student who's interested in
>>>> securing
>>>>> computer systems.
>>>>> I would like to warn you that is vulnerable to a Cross-Site
>>>>> Scripting vulnerability!
>>>>> PayPal Inc. is running a bug bounty program for professional security
>>>>> researchers.
>>>>> ...
>>>>> Unfortunately PayPal disqualified me from receiving any bounty payment
>>>>> because of being 17 years old...
>>>>> ...
>>>>> I don’t want to allege PayPal a kind of bug bounty cost saving, but
>>>> it’s not
>>>>> the best idea when you're interested in motivated security
>>>> researchers...
>>>> Fortunately Microsoft and Firefox took a more reasonable positions for
>>>> the bugs you discovered with their products.
>>>> PCWorld and MSN picked up the story:
>>>> and
>>>> .
>>>> It is now news worthy to Wikipedia, where it will live forever under
>>>> Criticisms (unfortunately, it appears PayPal does a lot of
>>>> questionable things so its just one of a long list).
>>>> Jeff
>>> Today I received an email from PayPal Site Security:
>>> "Hi Robert,
>>> We appreciate your research efforts and we are sorry that our
>>> age requirements restrict you from participating in our Bug Bounty Program.
>>> With regards to your specific bug submission, we should have also mentioned
>>> that the vulnerability you submitted was previously reported by another
>>> researcher and we are already actively fixing the issue. We hope that you
>>> understand that bugs that have previously been reported to us are not
>>> eligible for payment as we must honor the original researcher that provided
>>> the vulnerability.
>>> I would also mention that in general, PayPal has been a consistent
>>> supporter of what is known as “responsible disclosure”.  That is, ensuring
>>> that a company has a reasonable amount of time to fix a bug from
>>> notification to public disclosure.  This allows the company to fix the bug,
>>> so that criminals cannot use that knowledge to exploit it, but still gives
>>> the researchers the ability to draw attention to their skills and
>>> experience.  When researchers go down the “full disclosure” path, it then
>>> puts us in a race with criminals who may successfully use the vulnerability
>>> you found to victimize our customers.  We do not support the full
>>> disclosure methodology, precisely because it puts real people at
>>> unnecessary risk. We hope you keep that in mind when doing future research.
>>> We acknowledge that PayPal can do more to recognize younger security
>>> researchers around the world. As a first step, we would like you to be the
>>> first security researcher in the history of our program to receive an
>>> official "Letter of Recognition" from our Chief Information Security
>>> Officer Michael Barrett (attached, will follow up with a signed copy
>>> tomorrow). We truly appreciate your contribution to helping keep PayPal
>>> secure for our customers and we will continue to explore other ways that we
>>> can we provide alternate recognition for younger researchers.
>>> We'd welcome the chance to explain this all to you first hand over the
>>> phone, please email us at this address with a number and good time to reach
>>> you and we’d be happy to follow-up.
>>> Thank you,
>>> PayPal Site Security"
>>> It's still curious that they only mentioned the first researcher who
>>> previously found the bug after all the media attention...Nevertheless I
>>> appreciate their intentions to acknowledge also younger security
>>> researchers, it's a step in the right direction!!
>>> Best regards,
>>> Robert Kugler
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter:
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter:
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -

Powered by blists - more mailing lists