lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOpQXKPyu+WjNLSiAmRHzpSzKBcWzHN89qomot=CBH+PVsA0hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:27:21 +0000
From: imipak <imipak@...il.com>
To: Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
mutin@...monwealthcare.org
Subject: Re: Where are you guys standing re: the (full)
disclosure
On 13/12/13 15:06, Mikhail A. Utin wrote:
> Answers:
[...]
> 2. If you keep it for yourself - no problems. If you disclose on Internet
before informing M$, there is certain risk, but first of all it is not
ethical.
Sure it is. It's just a different set of ethics than the ones you (or I)
would adhere to. "Ethics" isn't a universal absolute.
\a
--
wake up the past
and tell it to stay away
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists