lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131213171717.GD2588@sivokote.iziade.m$> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:17:17 +0200 From: Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Where are you guys standing re: the (full) disclosure On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:27:21PM +0000, imipak wrote: > On 13/12/13 15:06, Mikhail A. Utin wrote: > > Answers: > [...] > > 2. If you keep it for yourself - no problems. If you disclose on Internet > before informing M$, there is certain risk, but first of all it is not > ethical. > > Sure it is. It's just a different set of ethics than the ones you (or I) > would adhere to. "Ethics" isn't a universal absolute. > > > \a > Are M$ ethical? Their ethics boils down to making money, which is not different from a commercial botnet IMO. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists