full-disclosure - Re: Where are you guys standing re: the (full) disclosure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:17:17 +0200
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Where are you guys standing re: the (full)
 disclosure

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:27:21PM +0000, imipak wrote:
> On 13/12/13 15:06, Mikhail A. Utin wrote:
> > Answers:
> [...]
> > 2. If you keep it for yourself - no problems. If you disclose on Internet
> before informing M$, there is certain risk, but first of all it is not
> ethical.
> 
> Sure it is. It's just a different set of ethics than the ones you (or I)
> would adhere to. "Ethics" isn't a universal absolute.
> 
> 
> \a
>

Are M$ ethical? 

Their ethics boils down to making money,
which is not different from a commercial
botnet IMO.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/