lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131213171717.GD2588@sivokote.iziade.m$>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:17:17 +0200
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Where are you guys standing re: the (full)
 disclosure

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:27:21PM +0000, imipak wrote:
> On 13/12/13 15:06, Mikhail A. Utin wrote:
> > Answers:
> [...]
> > 2. If you keep it for yourself - no problems. If you disclose on Internet
> before informing M$, there is certain risk, but first of all it is not
> ethical.
> 
> Sure it is. It's just a different set of ethics than the ones you (or I)
> would adhere to. "Ethics" isn't a universal absolute.
> 
> 
> \a
>


Are M$ ethical? 

Their ethics boils down to making money,
which is not different from a commercial
botnet IMO.


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ