full-disclosure - RDRAND used directly when default engines loaded in openssl-1.0.1-beta1 through openssl-1.0.1e

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJVRA1RZJgO2wOKsY8pMxnwpHPnLgx9DiW4_1CzxotT==f3rFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 04:33:31 -0800
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: cpunks <cypherpunks@...nks.org>, 
 Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: RDRAND used directly when default engines loaded
 in openssl-1.0.1-beta1 through openssl-1.0.1e

as per the FreeBSD announcement[0] and others[1][2] direct use of
RDRAND as sole entropy source is not recommended.

from Westmere onward you could use AES-NI to make crypto fast in
OpenSSL.  a common theme is to initialize OpenSSL via
ENGINE_load_builtin_engines() which lets OpenSSL take advantage of
this acceleration.

with Sandy Bridge you also got RDRAND. now load_builtin_engines
results in the application using RDRAND directly for all entropy, in
addition to accelerating AES.

if you are using an application linked with openssl-1.0.1-beta1
through openssl-1.0.1e you should do one of the following:

a.) rebuild your OpenSSL with OPENSSL_NO_RDRAND defined.

b.) call RAND_set_rand_engine(NULL) after ENGINE_load_builtin_engines().

c.) git pull latest openssl with commit: "Don't use rdrand engine as
default unless explicitly requested." - Dr. Stephen Henson

the OPENSSL_NO_RDRAND option is recommended; an inadvertent call to
load engines elsewhere could re-enable this bad rng behavior.

best regards,

0. "FreeBSD Developer Summit: Security Working Group, /dev/random"
  https://wiki.freebsd.org/201309DevSummit/Security

1. "Surreptitiously Tampering with Computer Chips"
  https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/09/surreptitiously.html

2. "How does the NSA break SSL? ... Weak random number generators"
  http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/12/how-does-nsa-break-ssl.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/