[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJVRA1SdJoG1gh-hkT9CHaYwUkWWUUYeX=X=uefAYMdxwsdXxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:25:49 -0800
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: cpunks <cypherpunks@...nks.org>,
Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: RDRAND used directly when default engines
loaded in openssl-1.0.1-beta1 through openssl-1.0.1e
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:33 AM, coderman <coderman@...il.com> wrote:
> ...
> if you are using an application linked with openssl-1.0.1-beta1
> through openssl-1.0.1e you should do one of the following:
>...
> b.) call RAND_set_rand_engine(NULL) after ENGINE_load_builtin_engines().
correction:
this won't leave you vulnerable, but it will crash your app. not
broken convention:
/* If we are using a version of OpenSSL that supports native RDRAND
make sure that we force disable its use as sole entropy source.
See https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/10402 */
if (SSLeay() > OPENSSL_V_SERIES(1,0,0)) {
t = ENGINE_get_default_RAND();
if (t &&
(strcmp(ENGINE_get_id(t), "rdrand") == 0)) {
log_warn(LD_CRYPTO, "OpenSSL is using RDRAND by default."
" Attempting to force disable.");
ENGINE_unregister_RAND(t);
ENGINE_register_all_complete();
}
}
see https://peertech.org/dist/tor-latest-rdrand-disable.patch
best regards,
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists