full-disclosure - Re: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+CewVDZZ4H70LQzV0RPRDp2fbA83nJkUXTOWeo8UMtaL287og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:16:35 +0000
From: "Nicholas Lemonias." <lem.nikolas@...glemail.com>
To: Julius Kivimäki <julius.kivimaki@...il.com>, 
 full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

*You are wrong about accessing the files. What has not been confirmed is
remote code execution. We are working on it.*
*And please, OWASP is recognised worldwide... *

*Files can be accessed through Google Take out with a little bit of skills.*

*https://www.google.com/settings/takeout
<https://www.google.com/settings/takeout> *




On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Julius Kivimäki
<julius.kivimaki@...il.com>wrote:

> Did you even read that article? (Not that OWASP has any sort of
> credibility anyways). From what I saw in your previous post you are both
> unable to execute the files or even access them and thus unable to
> manipulate the content-type the files are returned with, therefore there is
> no vulnerability (According to the article you linked.).
>
> BTW, you should look for more cool vulnerabilities in amazons EC2, I'm
> sure you will find some "Unrestricted File Upload" holes.
>
>
> 2014-03-13 16:18 GMT+02:00 Nicholas Lemonias. <lem.nikolas@...glemail.com>
> :
>
> Here is your answer.
>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Unrestricted_File_Upload
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Julius Kivimäki <
>> julius.kivimaki@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> When did the ability to upload files of arbitrary types become a
>>> security issue? If the file doesn't get executed, it's really not a
>>> problem. (Besides from potentially breaking site layout standpoint.)
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-03-13 12:43 GMT+02:00 Nicholas Lemonias. <
>>> lem.nikolas@...glemail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Google vulnerabilities uncovered...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Expert-Finds-File-Upload-Vulnerability-in-YouTube-Google-Denies-It-s-a-Security-Issue-431489.shtml
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/