full-disclosure - Re: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:20:15 +0200
From: Julius Kivimäki <julius.kivimaki@...il.com>
To: "Nicholas Lemonias." <lem.nikolas@...glemail.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Google vulnerabilities with PoC

OWASP is recognized worldwide, so is CEH and a bunch of other morons. That
doesn't mean their publications are worth anything. Now tell me, why would
arbitrary file upload on a CDN lead to code execution (Besides for HTML,
which you have been unable to confirm)?


2014-03-13 18:16 GMT+02:00 Nicholas Lemonias. <lem.nikolas@...glemail.com>:

> *You are wrong about accessing the files. What has not been confirmed is
> remote code execution. We are working on it.*
> *And please, OWASP is recognised worldwide... *
>
> *Files can be accessed through Google Take out with a little bit of
> skills.*
>
> *https://www.google.com/settings/takeout
> <https://www.google.com/settings/takeout> *
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Julius Kivimäki <
> julius.kivimaki@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Did you even read that article? (Not that OWASP has any sort of
>> credibility anyways). From what I saw in your previous post you are both
>> unable to execute the files or even access them and thus unable to
>> manipulate the content-type the files are returned with, therefore there is
>> no vulnerability (According to the article you linked.).
>>
>> BTW, you should look for more cool vulnerabilities in amazons EC2, I'm
>> sure you will find some "Unrestricted File Upload" holes.
>>
>>
>> 2014-03-13 16:18 GMT+02:00 Nicholas Lemonias. <lem.nikolas@...glemail.com
>> >:
>>
>> Here is your answer.
>>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Unrestricted_File_Upload
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Julius Kivimäki <
>>> julius.kivimaki@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When did the ability to upload files of arbitrary types become a
>>>> security issue? If the file doesn't get executed, it's really not a
>>>> problem. (Besides from potentially breaking site layout standpoint.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-03-13 12:43 GMT+02:00 Nicholas Lemonias. <
>>>> lem.nikolas@...glemail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Google vulnerabilities uncovered...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Expert-Finds-File-Upload-Vulnerability-in-YouTube-Google-Denies-It-s-a-Security-Issue-431489.shtml
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/