| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <53C85E1A.9020903@roosoft.ltd.uk> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:36:58 +0100 From: devel@...soft.ltd.uk To: "Ivan .Heca" <ivanhec@...il.com>, fulldisclosure@...lists.org Subject: Re: [FD] Peeling the onion: Almost everyone involved in developing Tor was (or is) funded by the US government | PandoDaily On 17/07/14 01:10, Ivan .Heca wrote: > Funding doubled, so engineering some back doors? > > In 2012, Tor nearly doubled its budget, taking in $2.2 million from > Pentagon and intel-connected grants: $876,099 came from the DoD, $353,000 > from the State Department, $387,800 from IBB. > > That same year, Tor lined up an unknown amount funding from the > Broadcasting Board of Governors to finance fast exit nodes. > > http://pando.com/2014/07/16/tor-spooks/ > > _______________________________________________ > Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list > http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure > Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/ You might find this interesting then. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJNxbpbHA-I The code is not the weak point, the idea that State funded operations can co-op enough exit nodes to subvert the network and make a difference is. -- _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists