[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m364e5svju.fsf@bzzz.home.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:05:57 +0400
From: Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>, sho@...s.nec.co.jp, tytso@....edu,
jack@...e.cz, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Ext3 online defrag
>>>>> Eric Sandeen (ES) writes:
ES> Alex Tomas wrote:
>> 3) scalable reservation
>> required for delayed allocation to avoid -ENOSPC at flush time.
>> current version uses per-sb spinlock.
ES> Can you elaborate on this issue? Shouldn't delayed allocation
ES> decrement free space immediately, and only the actual block location
ES> choice is delayed? Or is this due to potential extra metadata space
ES> required as blocks are allocated?
exactly. in this case, reservation has nothing to do with allocation
or preallocation of real blocks. this is just a *per-sb counter* of
blocks reserved for allocation at flush time. it includes all
non-allocated-yet blocks and metadata needed to allocate them (bitmaps,
group descriptors, blocks extent tree, etc). the previous version
of mballoc has reservation, but it doesn't scale very well being
a single global counter protected by the spinlock. at least, in many
regular loads I observed the reservation function in top30 of oprofile.
thanks, Alex
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists