[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45421698.2070704@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:24:24 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>
CC: sho@...s.nec.co.jp, tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Ext3 online defrag
Alex Tomas wrote:
>>>>>> Eric Sandeen (ES) writes:
>
> ES> Alex Tomas wrote:
> >> 3) scalable reservation
> >> required for delayed allocation to avoid -ENOSPC at flush time.
> >> current version uses per-sb spinlock.
>
> ES> Can you elaborate on this issue? Shouldn't delayed allocation
> ES> decrement free space immediately, and only the actual block location
> ES> choice is delayed? Or is this due to potential extra metadata space
> ES> required as blocks are allocated?
>
> exactly. in this case, reservation has nothing to do with allocation
> or preallocation of real blocks. this is just a *per-sb counter* of
> blocks reserved for allocation at flush time. it includes all
> non-allocated-yet blocks and metadata needed to allocate them (bitmaps,
> group descriptors, blocks extent tree, etc). the previous version
> of mballoc has reservation, but it doesn't scale very well being
> a single global counter protected by the spinlock. at least, in many
> regular loads I observed the reservation function in top30 of oprofile.
Thanks. XFS recently made similar scalability changes in this area, see the 2006
OLS paper, if you're interested.
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists