linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC] [patch 2/3] i_version update for ext4: ext4 specific code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070123184814.GG5236@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:48:14 -0700
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To:	Cordenner jean noel <jean-noel.cordenner@...l.net>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [patch 2/3] i_version update for ext4: ext4 specific code

On Jan 23, 2007  18:24 +0100, Cordenner jean noel wrote:
> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@
>  #define i_size_high    i_dir_acl
> 
>  #if defined(__KERNEL__) || defined(__linux__)
> -#define i_reserved1    osd1.linux1.l_i_reserved1
> +#define ext4_i_version  osd1.linux1.l_i_version

This naming is inconsistent with other inode fields, what about
i_disk_version, like i_disk_size also used in the code?

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html