[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070509173740.GQ6375@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:37:40 -0700
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To: Avantika Mathur <mathur@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ext4 devel interlock meeting minutes (May 7, 2007)
On May 09, 2007 10:02 -0700, Avantika Mathur wrote:
> Metablock Groups:
>
> - Mingming mentioned that in the metablock group feature, the inode
> metadata is not moved with the rest of the metadata. Ted will check
> this, as he thought this had been implemented.
>
> - Online resize does not use metablock groups, and is currently limited
> to 2TB.
>
> - Also need to remove sanity checks in the mount code
>
> - Once these issues are fixed, the metablock group feature can be turned
> on by default for ext4 filesysytems
In my recent investigation of META_BG, it appears that BOTH the kernel
and e2fsprogs do NOT handle group metadata (bitmaps, itable) outside the
group.
In the kernel ext[234]_check_descriptors() requires the bitmaps and itable
to be inside the group even though META_BG is supported for a long time.
In e2fsck/super.c check_super_block() also requires that the bitmaps and
itable be inside the group even though e2fsck has claimed META_BG for a
long time.
That means it is virtually impossible to allow the group metadata to move
under the META_BG feature. It might be possible to predicate this change
under both 64BIT and META_BG, though this is somewhat non-standard.
Alternately, we could allow the relocation of bitmaps and itables under
BIG_BG, which is itself covers the relocation aspects and also allows
the ability to change the group size.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists