[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1181854724.3883.14.camel@dyn9047017103.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:58:43 -0700
From: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
To: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@...sterfs.com>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>,
Jean noel Cordenner <jean-noel.cordenner@...l.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Separated 64-bit i_version patch
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 21:26 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> This patch converts the 32-bit i_version in the generic inode to a 64-
> bit
> i_version field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Noel Cordenner <jean-noel.cordenner@...l.net>
> Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@...sterfs.com>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.21/include/linux/fs.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21.orig/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ linux-2.6.21/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ struct inode {
> uid_t i_uid;
> gid_t i_gid;
> dev_t i_rdev;
> - unsigned long i_version;
> + uint64_t i_version;
> loff_t i_size;
> #ifdef __NEED_I_SIZE_ORDERED
> seqcount_t i_size_seqcount;
>
>
I think u64 is better here. It seems uint64_t is not defined in some
cases and rarely being used.
Mingming
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists