lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:06:51 +0530
From:	Girish Shilamkar <girish@...sterfs.com>
To:	Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...l.net>
Cc:	Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>,
	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: performance testing

On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 11:48 +0200, Valerie Clement wrote:
> Shouldn't it be :
> 
>    struct commit_header *tmp = (struct commit_header*)(bh->b_data + i);
> 
Ohhh, yes you are right. This is the correct thing to do.
This patch which is been used has some endian-ness bugs. I had sent an
updated patch for 2.6.22-rc5 on 
19 June. I think we should be using the updated patch else it may break
on big-endian machines. 
Even the updated patch has this bug i.e "struct commit_header *tmp
=...."

Thanks,
Girish.




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists