[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A5163D.803@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:57:33 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix inode_table test in ext234_check_descriptors
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> ext[234]_check_descriptors sanity checks block group descriptor geometry
> at mount time, testing whether the block bitmap, inode bitmap, and
> inode table reside wholly within the blockgroup. However, the inode
> table test is off by one so that if the last block in the inode table
> resides on the last block of the block group, the test incorrectly
> fails. This is because it tests the last block as (start + length)
> rather than (start + length - 1).
>
> This can be seen by trying to mount a filesystem made such as:
> mkfs.ext2 -F -b 1024 -m 0 -g 256 -N 3744 fsfile 1024
> which yields:
> EXT2-fs error (device loop0): ext2_check_descriptors: Inode table for group 0 not in group (block 101)!
> EXT2-fs: group descriptors corrupted!
Hm, sorry, after seeing Miklos' last patches... should I be sending
these as 3 different patches for ext2, 3, and 4...?
-Eric (who really doesn't want to make Andrew mad at him) :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists